Title

Carbon Dioxide Sequestrian: When And How Much?

Author(s)

Klaus Keller Klaus Keller (Pennsylvania State University)

Zili Yang Zili Yang (SUNY at Binghamton)

Matt Hall Matt Hall (Brookings Institution)

David F. Bradford David Bradford (Princeton University and New York University)

Abstract

We analyze carbon dioxide (CO2 sequestration as a strategy to manage future climate change in an optimal economic growth framework. We approach the problem in two ways: first, by using a simple analytical model, and second, by using a numerical optimization model which allows us to explore the problem in a more realistic setting. CO2 sequestration is not a perfect substitute for avoiding CO2 production because CO2 leaks back to the atmosphere and hence imposes future costs. The "efficiency factor" of CO2 sequestration can be expressed as the ratio of the avoided emissions to the economically equivalent amount of sequestered CO2 emissions. A simple analytical model in terms of a net-present value criterion suggests that short-term sequestration methods such as afforestation can be somewhat (approximately 60 %) efficient, while long term sequestration (such as deep aquifer or deep ocean sequestration) can be very (greater than or equal to 90%) efficient. A numerical study indicates that CO2 sequestration methods at a cost within the range of present estimates reduce the economically optimal CO2 concentrations and climate related damages. The potential savings associated with CO2 sequestration is equivalent in our utilitarian model to a one-time investment of several percent of present gross world product.

Creation Date

2003-09

Section URL ID

CEPS

Paper Number

94

URL

https://gceps.princeton.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/94bradford.pdf

File Function

Jel

Q54

Keyword(s)

Suppress

false

Series

3