Title

Omnivores Versus Snobs? Musical Tastes in the United States and France

Author(s)

Angele Christin Angele Christin (Princeton University)

Abstract

Two major theories structure debates on the relationship between socioeconomic status and aesthetic tastes. The distinction hypothesis, developed by French scholars with French data, claims that high-status people with highbrow tastes shun popular culture. The omnivores hypothesis, developed by U.S. sociologists with American data, states that highbrow respondents have on the contrary more tolerant and omnivorous musical attitudes than other respondents. Do these propositions reflect real differences between the United States and France with regard to socioeconomic variation in musical tastes, or differing theoretical traditions in the two countries? This research provides some support for both views. An examination of data on musical tastes (Survey of Public Participation in the Arts 2002, Enquete sur les Pratiques Culturelles des Francais 2008) reveals a very similar organization of aesthetic judgment in the U.S. and France: in both countries highbrow respondents are omnivorous. But significant differences between the two countries are also documented for older cohorts. Older cohorts follow a pattern of distinction in France, but not in the United States. This finding delineates how once-real differences between the two countries in the relationship between socioeconomic status and aesthetic tastes may have been blunted by historical change.

Creation Date

2010-07

Section URL ID

CACPS

Paper Number

40

URL

https://culturalpolicy.princeton.edu/sites/culturalpolicy/files/wp40-christin.pdf

File Function

Jel

Z11, D12, H31, O52

Keyword(s)

aesthetic tastes, distinction, omnivorousness, France, Survey of Public Participation in the Arts, Enquete sur les Pratiques Culturelles des Francais

Suppress

false

Series

6